Inserire una breve descrizione delle modifiche fatte
Minor changes are by default collapsed in the page history.
No changes
The page does not exist yet.
Failed to load changes
Version by on
Leave Collaboration
Are you sure you want to leave the realtime collaboration and continue editing alone? The changes you save while editing alone will lead to merge conflicts with the changes auto-saved by the realtime editing session.
Unmasking Bias in AI-Driven CV Screening: Evaluating Prompt Engineering Techniques to Enhance Fairness in GPT-4o Decision-Making
The project explores the potential biases exhibited by GPT-4o in the context of CV screen- ing, focusing on how different prompting techniques influence its decision-making process. As AI systems like GPT-4o are increasingly integrated into recruitment workflows, ensuring fairness and minimizing bias are critical for ethical deployment. By designing a series of controlled experiments, we evaluate how various prompt phrasings, structures, and levels of specificity impact the outcomes of CV evaluations. The study analyzes whether GPT-4o demonstrates preferences based on demo- graphic attributes (e.g., gender, ethnicity, or age) or professional characteristics (e.g., education or experience) depending on the framing of the input. The results aim to highlight best prac- tices for prompt engineering to reduce bias and provide insights into ethical considerations when using generative AI in sensitive decision-making processes. This work contributes to a broader understanding of AI transparency and accountability in recruitment.