page       attach   
IEEE FIPA Workshop on Design Process Documentation and Fragmentation
Lyon, France, 30/08/2010–31/08/2010

Complex software system development with the agent-oriented approach requires suitable agent oriented modelling techniques and processes providing explicit support for the key abstractions of the agent paradigm. Several design processes supporting analysis, design and implementation of Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) have been to date proposed in the context of Agent Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE). Each of them presents different advantages when applied to specific problems. A unique design process cannot be general enough to be useful to everyone without some kind of customisation; when developing a new design process, several MAS developers/designers prefer to use phases, models or elements coming from existing design processes in order to build up a personalised approach for their own problem thus spending time and increasing the cost for learning different approaches. This problem can be faced by adopting the method engineering paradigm (more precisely the situational method engineering paradigm). Situational method engineering paradigm provides means for constructing ad-hoc software engineering processes following an approach based on the reuse of portions of existing design processes, the so called method fragments stored in a repository, called method base. Method fragment or simply fragment is the building block of ad-hoc design processes; several well known approaches in literature present different definitions and descriptions of method fragment but all of them share the same assumption: each existing design process can be considered as composed of self contained components, the fragments. The definition of method fragment in every kind of situational method engineering approach constitutes the base for the extraction of fragments from existing design processes, for their retrieval from the method base and for their assembly in the new design process. Today it does not exist (yet) a unique, standard, definition of method fragment besides when looking at existing design processes, usually designers have to cope with an additional difficulty consisting in the lack of uniformity in their documentation. Other, still open issues, lies in the definition of techniques for fragment selection and composition.

The IEEE FIPA Design Process Documentation and Fragmentation working group is working on such topics in order to provide a solution to the raised issues in terms of a shared and easily adoptable specification for the documentation of the design process and of the process fragment. More in details, this working group aims to propose a definition of method fragment to be used during a situational method engineering process, the fundamental elements it is composed of and the metamodel it is based on. The first, currently undergoing, step is the identification of the most suitable process metamodel and notation: information for the representation of the existing design processes from which the fragments have to be extracted, and (ii) for the representation of fragments themselves. This step will outcome in the definition of a proper template for the description of agent-oriented design processes. Such a template will, obviously, refer to the selected process metamodel and suggest the adoption of good practices in documenting existing processes as well as defining new ones. A refined draft of the template is already available from the working group website. The final step will be the definition of the Method Fragment Structure and Documentation Template. This work will start from the results obtained by the old FIPA Methodology Technical Committee (years 2003-2005).

topics of interest

A non-restrictive list of topics of interest includes:

  • Situational Method Engineering (SME) 
  • Agent Oriented Software Engineering (AOSE)
  • Standards for the description of design processes and process/method fragments
  • Models, Metamodels and Notations for design processes/fragments
  • Techniques for process fragmentation
  • Techniques for fragments selection
  • Techniques for fragments composition
  • Best practices for defining/documenting fragments and processes
  • Theories and practical experiences in the field
hosting event
world MALLOW 2010
works as
origin event for publication
page_white_acrobatExploring the Boundaries: When Method Fragmentation is not Convenient (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Chiara Leonardi, Luca Sabatucci, Angelo Susi, Massimo Zancanaro
page_white_acrobatDescribing GORMAS using the FIPA Design Process Documentation and Fragmentation Working Group template (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Sergio Esparcia, Estefania Argente, Vicent Botti
page_white_acrobatProcess Documentation Standardization: An Initial Evaluation (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Massimo Cossentino, Alma Gómez-Rodríguez, Juan Carlos González-Moreno, Ambra Molesini, Andrea Omicini
page_white_acrobatTowards a New Approach for MAS Situational Method Engineering: a Fragment Definition (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Sara Casare, Zahia Guessoum, Jaime Brandao, Anarosa Sichman
page_white_acrobatApplying Process Document Standarization to INGENIAS (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Juan Carlos González-Moreno-Moreno, Alma Gómez-Rodríguez
page_white_acrobatA Glimpse of the ASPECS Process documented with the FIPA DPDF Template (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Massimo Cossentino, Stephane Galland, Nicolas Gaud, Vincent Hilaire, Abderrafiaa Koukam
page_white_acrobatThe O-MaSE Process: a Standard View (paper in proceedings, 2010) — Juan C. Garcia-Ojeda, Scott DeLoach