Skip to Content

Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach

   page       BibTeX_logo.png       attach   
Marco BIlli

The paper discusses how explainability can be provided through logic programming and argumentation. In particular, the CrossJustice project is taken as a testbed reifying its case study in a ready-to-use technology—Arg-tuProlog, which seamlessly integrates logic programming and argumentation. Examples are developed and discussed showing the effectiveness of such an approach.

evento contenitore
world AICOL-XIII@JURIX 2021
pubblicazione di riferimento
page_white_acrobat Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach (articolo in atti, ) — Marco Billi, Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor
funge da
presentazione di riferimento per
page_white_acrobat Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach (articolo in atti, ) — Marco Billi, Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor

Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach
— tipo
presentazione
— lingua
Inglese wgb.gif
chi
— oratori
Marco BIlli
— autori
Marco Billi  •  Roberta Calegari  •  Giuseppe Contissa  •  Giuseppe Pisano  •  Galileo Sartor  •  Giovanni Sartor
dove e quando
— contesto
AICOL 2021
— data
08/12/2021
APICe
— evento contenitore
AICOL-XIII@JURIX 2021
— pubblicazione di riferimento
Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach