Enter a brief description of your changes
(Required)
Minor changes are by default collapsed in the page history.
No changes
The page does not exist yet.
Failed to load changes
Version by on
Leave Collaboration
Are you sure you want to leave the realtime collaboration and continue editing alone? The changes you save while editing alone will lead to merge conflicts with the changes auto-saved by the realtime editing session.
Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach
The paper discusses how explainability can be provided through logic programming and argumentation. In particular, the CrossJustice project is taken as a testbed reifying its case study in a ready-to-use technology—Arg-tuProlog, which seamlessly integrates logic programming and argumentation. Examples are developed and discussed showing the effectiveness of such an approach.
Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach (AICOL-XIII@JURIX 2021, 08/12/2021) — Marco BIlli 