Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach

Marco Billi; Roberta Calegari; Giuseppe Contissa; Giuseppe Pisano; Galileo Sartor; Giovanni Sartor

Skip to Content

Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach

Marco BIlli

The paper discusses how explainability can be provided through logic programming and argumentation. In particular, the CrossJustice project is taken as a testbed reifying its case study in a ready-to-use technology—Arg-tuProlog, which seamlessly integrates logic programming and argumentation. Examples are developed and discussed showing the effectiveness of such an approach.

hosting event

AICOL-XIII@JURIX 2021

reference publication

Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach (paper in proceedings, ) — Marco Billi, Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor

works as

reference talk for

Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach (paper in proceedings, ) — Marco Billi, Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor