Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach

@talk{arglpxaiaicol2021,
    abstract = {The paper discusses how explainability can be provided through logic programming and argumentation. In particular, the CrossJustice project is taken as a testbed reifying its case study in a ready-to-use technology—Arg-tuProlog, which seamlessly integrates logic programming and argumentation. Examples are developed and discussed showing the effectiveness of such an approach.},
    apice = {ArglpXaiAicol2021},
    author = {Marco Billi and Calegari, Roberta and Giuseppe Contissa and Pisano, Giuseppe and Galileo Sartor and Giovanni Sartor},
    date = {2021-12-08},
    howpublished = {AICOL 2021},
    language = {en},
    month = dec,
    sort = {talk},
    speaker = {Marco Billi},
    title = {Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach},
    type = {Talk},
    year = 2021
}