Minor changes are by default collapsed in the page history.
No changes
The page does not exist yet.
Failed to load changes
Version by on
Leave Collaboration
Are you sure you want to leave the realtime collaboration and continue editing alone? The changes you save while editing alone will lead to merge conflicts with the changes auto-saved by the realtime editing session.
20th International Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence (AIxIA 2021), pages 91–103
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (AIxIA Series)
Springer International Publishing
July 2022
A modular extension of Arg-tuProlog, a light-weight argumentation tool, is here presented and discussed, highlighting how it enables reasoning with rules and interpretations of multiple legal systems. Its effectiveness is demonstrated with examples from different national private international law (PIL) laws, running in Arg-tuProlog. PIL addresses overlaps and conflicts between legal systems by distributing cases between the authorities of such systems (jurisdiction) and establishing what rules these authorities have to apply to each case (choice of law).
reference talk
Modular logic argumentation in Arg-tuProlog (AIxIA 2021, 01/12/2021) — Giuseppe Pisano (Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe, Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor)
Modular logic argumentation in Arg-tuProlog (AIxIA 2021, 01/12/2021) — Giuseppe Pisano (Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe, Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor)
