Argumentation and Defeasible Reasoning in the Law
 |
 |
 |
abstract = {Different formalisms for defeasible reasoning have been used to represent knowledge and reason in the legal field. In this work, we provide an overview of the following logic-based approaches to defeasible reasoning: defeasible logic, Answer Set Programming, ABA+, ASPIC+, and DeLP. We compare features of these approaches under three perspectives: the logical model (knowledge representation), the method (computational mechanisms), and the technology (available software resources). On top of that, two real examples in the legal domain are designed and implemented in ASPIC+ to showcase the benefit of an argumentation approach in real-world domains. The CrossJustice and Interlex projects are taken as a testbed, and experiments are conducted with the Arg2P technology.},
apice = {DefeasibleReasoningJmdpi20},
author = {Marco Billi and Calegari, Roberta and Giuseppe Contissa and Francesca Lagioia and Pisano, Giuseppe and Galileo Sartor and Sartor, Giovanni},
doi = {10.3390/j4040061},
editor = {Larisa Ivascu},
iris = {11585/844314},
issn = {2571-8800},
journal = {J — Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal},
keywords = {argumentation, defeasible reasoning, tools and technologies, Arg2P},
month = dec,
note = {Special Issue The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Law},
number = 4,
numpages = 18,
pages = {897--914},
publisher = {MDPI},
subtitle = {Special Issue The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Law},
title = {Argumentation and Defeasible Reasoning in the Law},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8800/4/4/61},
volume = 4,
year = 2021
}