Skip to Content

Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts

   Info_icon.svg       BibTeX_logo.svg   
Giuseppe Pisano, Roberta Calegari, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor
Francesca Toni, Sylwia Polberg, Richard Booth, Martin Caminada, Hiroyuki Kido (a cura di)
Computational Models of Argument, pp. 284–295
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 353
IOS Press
2022

In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.

parole chiave   meta-argumentation, argumentation, ASPIC+
presentazione di riferimento
Talk_icon.svg Arguing about the existence of conflicts (COMMA 2022, 16/09/2022) — Giuseppe Pisano
rivista o collana
Journal_icon.svg Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (FAIA)

Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts
— stato
pubblicato
— tipo
articolo in atti
chi
— autori
Giuseppe Pisano  •  Roberta Calegari  •  Henry Prakken  •  Giovanni Sartor
— curatori
Francesca Toni  •  Sylwia Polberg  •  Richard Booth  •  Martin Caminada  •  Hiroyuki Kido
dove e quando
— data di pubblicazione
2022
— volume
Computational Models of Argument
— serie
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
— volume n.
353
— pagine
284–295
— numero di pagine
12
— editore
IOS Press
allineamento BibTeX
— luogo
Cardiff
— istituzione
Cardiff University
URL
URL
— DOI
10.3233/FAIA220160
— IRIS
11585/903807
— Scopus
2-s2.0-85139468476
ISBN & ISSN
— ISBN
978-1-64368-306-5
— E-ISBN
978-1-64368-307-2
APICe
— presentazione di riferimento
Arguing about the existence of conflicts
— rivista o collana
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications