Enter a brief description of your changes
(Required)
Minor changes are by default collapsed in the page history.
No changes
The page does not exist yet.
Failed to load changes
Version by on
Leave Collaboration
Are you sure you want to leave the realtime collaboration and continue editing alone? The changes you save while editing alone will lead to merge conflicts with the changes auto-saved by the realtime editing session.
A Comparative Evaluation of Agent-Oriented Methodologies
Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems: The Agent-Oriented Software Engineering Handbook, chapter 7, pages 127–149
Multiagent Systems, Artificial Societies, and Simulated Organizations 11
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA
June 2004
Multiple agent-oriented methodologies were introduced in recent years, however no systematic evaluation of these was offered. In this work we perform a comparative evaluation of three well-known agent-oriented methodologies: Gaia, Tropos, and MaSE. To perform this evaluation we use an existing framework that focuses on four major facets of a methodology: concepts and properties, notations and modeling techniques, development process, and pragmatics. Analyzing the results of our evaluation, we recognize several facets that need further improvements within the existing agent-oriented methodologies. Our study does not attempt to state what the right methodology is. Rather, it examines existing agent-oriented methodologies.
Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems (edited volume, 2004) — Federico Bergenti, Marie-Pierre Gleizes, Franco Zambonelli