The Burden of Persuasion in Structured Argumentation

   Info_icon.svg       Eye_icon.svg       BibTeX_logo.svg   
Juliano Maranhão, Adam Zachary Wyner (eds.)
ICAIL '21: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pages 180–184
ICAIL '21
ACM
June 2021

In this paper we provide an account of the burden of persuasion in the context of structured argumentation. A formal model for the burden of persuasion is defined, discussed, and used to capture the role of the burden of persuasion in adjudicating conflicts between conflicting arguments and in determining the dialectical status of arguments. We consider how our model can also capture adversarial burdens of proof, namely, those cases in which failure to establish an argument for a proposition burdened with persuasion entails establishing the complementary proposition.

keywords   Burden of persuasion, argumentation, legal reasoning
reference talk
Talk_icon.svg The Burden of Persuasion in Structured Argumentation (ICAIL 2021, 23/06/2021) — Giovanni Sartor (Roberta Calegari, Régis Riveret, Giovanni Sartor)
origin event
funding project
Project_icon.svg CompuLaw — Computable Law (01/11/2019–31/10/2025)
works as
reference publication for talk
Talk_icon.svg The Burden of Persuasion in Structured Argumentation (ICAIL 2021, 23/06/2021) — Giovanni Sartor (Roberta Calegari, Régis Riveret, Giovanni Sartor)