Giovanni Sartor  /  Andrea Omicini, Giovanni Sartor, Roberta Calegari, Francesca Lagioia, Giuseppe Contissa

Different formalisms for defeasible reasoning have been used to represent knowl- edge and reason with it. In this work, we provide an overview of the following logic-based approaches to defeasible reasoning: Defeasible Logic, Answer Set Pro- gramming, ABA+, ASPIC+ and DeLP. We compare features of these approaches under three perspectives: the logical model (knowledge representation), the method (computational mechanisms), and the technology (available software resources). On this basis, we identify and apply criteria for assessing their suitability for legal applications. We discuss the different approaches through a legal running example.

Events

32nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2019)
Madrid, Spain — 11/12/2019–13/12/2019

Publications

Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Francesca Lagioia, Andrea Omicini, Giovanni Sartor
Defeasible Systems in Legal Reasoning: A Comparative Assessment
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2019: The Thirty-second Annual Conference, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 322, 11-13 December 2019

Tags:
    

Talk

Defeasible Systems in Legal Reasoning: A Comparative Assessment

— speakers

Giovanni Sartor

— authors

Andrea Omicini, Giovanni Sartor, Roberta Calegari, Francesca Lagioia, Giuseppe Contissa

— sort

talk

— language

wgb.gif

Context

— events

JURIX 2019

— at

32nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX 2019)

— where

Madrid, Spain

— when

12/12/2019

Links

— publications

Defeasible Systems in Legal Reasoning: A Comparative Assessment

Partita IVA: 01131710376 - Copyright © 2008-2021 APICe@DISI Research Group - PRIVACY