Explaining conflicts of norms in criminal matters: an argumentation approach


Marco BIlli  /  Marco Billi, Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor

The paper discusses how explainability can be provided through logic programming and argumentation. In particular, the CrossJustice project is taken as a testbed reifying its case study in a ready-to-use technology—Arg-tuProlog, which seamlessly integrates logic programming and argumentation. Examples are developed and discussed showing the effectiveness of such an approach.

Publications

Tags:

Talk

— speakers

Marco BIlli

— authors

Marco Billi, Roberta Calegari, Giuseppe Contissa, Giuseppe Pisano, Galileo Sartor, Giovanni Sartor

— sort

talk

— language

wgb.gif

Context

AICOL 2021

— when

08/12/2021

Partita IVA: 01131710376 - Copyright © 2008-2022 APICe@DISI Research Group - PRIVACY