Changes for page Overview
To version 4.1
edited by Andrea Omicini
on 10/08/2021 16:42
on 10/08/2021 16:42
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -Overview 1 +ReSpecT Overview - Syntax
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki 1.01 +XWiki 2.1 - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,58 +1,56 @@ 1 -#includeMacros("Main.MacroSheet") 1 +{{include document="Main.MacroSheet"/}}{{velocity}} 2 +* #respect() (**Re**action **Spec**ification **T**uples) is a logic-based language for the coordination of complex software systems. 3 +* #respect() promotes a coordination model providing tuple centres as programmable, general-purpose coordination media. 4 +* the behaviour of #respect() tuple centres is programmed through the #respect() first-order logic language. 2 2 3 - 1#respect()Overview6 +== The #respect() Tuple Centre Coordination Model == 4 4 5 -#respect() (*Re*action *Spec*ification *T*uples) is a logic-based language for the coordination of complex software systems. 6 -## 7 -#respect() promotes a coordination model providing tuple centres as programmable, general-purpose coordination media. 8 -## 9 -The behaviour of #respect() tuple centres is programmed through the #respect() first-order logic language. 10 - 11 -1.1 The #respect() Tuple Centre Coordination Model 12 - 13 13 A tuple centre is a tuple space enhanced with the possibility to program its behaviour in response to interactions. 14 14 ## 15 -First of all, coordinated entities ( ~~#respect() agents~~, henceforth, or simply~~agents~~) can operate on a #respect() tuple centre in the same way as on a standard Linda tuple space: by exchanging~~tuples~~— which are ordered collection of knowledge chunks — through a simple set of coordination primitive.10 +First of all, coordinated entities (//#respect() agents//, henceforth, or simply //agents//) can operate on a #respect() tuple centre in the same way as on a standard Linda tuple space: by exchanging //tuples// — which are ordered collection of knowledge chunks — through a simple set of coordination primitive. 16 16 ## 17 17 So, an agent can write a tuple in a tuple centre with an #code("out") primitive; or read a tuple from a tuple centre with primitives such as #code("in"), #code("rd"), #code("inp"), #code("rdp") specifying a tuple template - that is, an identifier for a set of tuples, according to some tuple matching mechanism. 18 18 ## 19 19 Reading tuples can be 20 -* ~~destructive~~ — #code("in"), #code("inp") remove the matching tuple — or ~~non-destructive~~ — #code("rd"), #code("rdp") simply read the matching tuple 21 -* ~~suspensive~~ — #code("in"), #code("rd") wait until a matching tuple is found — or ~~non-suspensive~~ — #code("inp"), #code("rdp") immediately return either the matching tuple or a failure result 22 -but is anyway always ~~non-deterministic~~: when more than one tuple in a tuple centre are found that match a tuple template, one is non-deterministically chosen among them and returned. 23 - 15 +* //destructive// — #code("in"), #code("inp") remove the matching tuple — or //non-destructive// — #code("rd"), #code("rdp") simply read the matching tuple 16 +* //suspensive// — #code("in"), #code("rd") wait until a matching tuple is found — or //non-suspensive// — #code("inp"), #code("rdp") immediately return either the matching tuple or a failure result 17 +<p/> 18 +but is anyway always //non-deterministic//: when more than one tuple in a tuple centre are found that match a tuple template, one is non-deterministically chosen among them and returned. 19 +<p/> 24 24 Accordingly, a tuple centre enjoys all the many features of a tuple space, which can be classified along three different dimensions: 21 + 25 25 * generative communication 26 26 * associative access 27 27 * suspensive semantics 28 - 29 -The main features of ~~generative communication~~(where information generated has an independent life with respect to the generator) are the forms of uncoupling (space, time, name) based on mediated interaction: sender and receiver do not need to know each other, to coexist in the same space or at the same time in order to communicate (to exchange a tuple, in particular), and more generally, to interact.25 +<p/> 26 +The main features of //generative communication// (where information generated has an independent life with respect to the generator) are the forms of uncoupling (space, time, name) based on mediated interaction: sender and receiver do not need to know each other, to coexist in the same space or at the same time in order to communicate (to exchange a tuple, in particular), and more generally, to interact. 30 30 ## 31 - ~~Associative access~~(access based on structure and content of information exchanged, rather than on location, or on name) based on tuple matching promotes synchronisation based on tuple structure and content: thus, coordination is data-driven, and allows for knowledge-based coordination patterns.28 +//Associative access// (access based on structure and content of information exchanged, rather than on location, or on name) based on tuple matching promotes synchronisation based on tuple structure and content: thus, coordination is data-driven, and allows for knowledge-based coordination patterns. 32 32 ## 33 -Finally, ~~suspensive semantics~~promotes coordination patterns based on knowledge availability, and couples well with incomplete, partial knowledge.34 - 35 -Even more, while the basic tuple centre model is independent of the type of tuple, #respect() tuple centres adopt logic tuples — both tuples and tuple templates are essentially Prolog ~~facts~~— and logic~~unification~~is used as the tuple-matching mechanism.30 +Finally, //suspensive semantics// promotes coordination patterns based on knowledge availability, and couples well with incomplete, partial knowledge. 31 +<p/> 32 +Even more, while the basic tuple centre model is independent of the type of tuple, #respect() tuple centres adopt logic tuples — both tuples and tuple templates are essentially Prolog //facts// — and logic //unification// is used as the tuple-matching mechanism. 36 36 ## 37 37 So, for instance, an agent #code("ag1") performing operation #code("we ? in(activity(ag1,CaseID))") on tuple centre #code("we") containing tuples #code("activity(ag1,c16)") and #code("activity(ag2,c22)") will be returned tuple #code("activity(ag1,c16)") — the one unifying with the template — removed from #code("we"). 38 38 ## 39 -Since the overall content of a tuple centre is a multiset of logic facts, it has a twofold interpretation as either a collection of messages, or a (logic) ~~theory of communication~~among agents — thus promoting in principle forms of~~reasoning about communication~~.40 - 41 -Finally, a tuple centre is a programmable tuple space, so as to add ~~programmability~~of the coordination medium as a new dimension of coordination.36 +Since the overall content of a tuple centre is a multiset of logic facts, it has a twofold interpretation as either a collection of messages, or a (logic) //theory of communication// among agents — thus promoting in principle forms of //reasoning about communication//. 37 +<p/> 38 +Finally, a tuple centre is a programmable tuple space, so as to add //programmability// of the coordination medium as a new dimension of coordination. 42 42 ## 43 43 While the behaviour of a tuple space in response to interaction events is fixed — so, the effects of coordination primitives is fixed —, the behaviour of a tuple centre can be tailored to the system needs by defining a set of specification tuples, or reactions, which determine how a tuple centre should react to incoming / outgoing events. 44 44 ## 45 45 While the basic tuple centre model is not bound to any specific language to define reactions, #respect() tuple centres are obviously programmed through the #respect() logic-based specification language. 46 46 47 - 1.1#respect() as a Core Coordination Language44 +== #respect() as a Core Coordination Language == 48 48 49 49 The original #respect() is a logic-based language for the specification of the behaviour of tuple centre. 50 50 ## 51 51 As a behaviour specification language, #respect(): 52 52 50 + 53 53 * enables the definition of computations within a tuple centre, called reactions, and 54 54 * makes it possible to associate reactions to events occurring in a tuple centre. 55 - 53 +<p/> 56 56 So, #respect() has both a declarative and a procedural part. 57 57 ## 58 58 As a specification language, it allows events to be declaratively associated to reactions by means of specific logic tuples, called specification tuples, whose form is #code("reaction(E,R)"). ... ... @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ 64 64 A reaction as a whole succeeds if all its reaction goals succeed, and fails otherwise. 65 65 ## 66 66 Each reaction is executed sequentially with a transactional semantics: so, a failed reaction has no effect on the state of a logic tuple centre. 67 - 65 +<p/> 68 68 All the reactions triggered by an event are executed before serving any other event: so, agents perceive the result of serving the event and executing all the associated reactions altogether as a single transition of the tuple centre state. 69 69 ## 70 70 As a result, the effect of a coordination primitive on a logic tuple centre can be made as complex as needed by the coordination requirements of a system. ... ... @@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ 72 72 Generally speaking, since #respect() has been shown to be Turing-equivalent, any computable coordination law could be in principle encapsulated into a #respect() tuple centre. 73 73 ## 74 74 This is why #respect() can be assumed as a general-purpose core language for coordination: a language that could then be used to represent and enact policies and rules for coordination systems of any sort. 75 - 76 -Adopting the declarative interpretation of logic tuples, a #respect() tuple centre has then a twofold nature a ~~theory of communication~~(the set of the ordinary tuples) and a~~theory of coordination~~(the set of the specification tuples).73 +<p/> 74 +Adopting the declarative interpretation of logic tuples, a #respect() tuple centre has then a twofold nature a //theory of communication// (the set of the ordinary tuples) and a //theory of coordination// (the set of the specification tuples). 77 77 ## 78 78 In principle, this allows intelligent agents to reason about the state of collaboration activities, and to possibly affect their dynamics. 79 79 ## 80 80 Furthermore, the twofold interpretation (either declarative or procedural) of #respect() specification tuples allows knowledge and control to be represented uniformly (as Prolog-like facts) and encapsulated within the same coordination artefact. 81 - 79 +{{/velocity}} 80 +{{include document="ReSpecT.MacroSheet"/}}