Arguing About the Existence of Conflicts

Giuseppe Pisano, Roberta Calegari, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor

Francesca Toni, Sylwia Polberg, Richard Booth, Martin Caminada, Hiroyuki Kido (eds.)
Computational Models of Argument, pages 284–295
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 353
IOS Press
2022

In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.

(keywords) meta-argumentation, argumentation, ASPIC+

Talks

Tags:

Publications

Home
Search
All

Publications / Views

Home

Clouds
•  tags  •  authors  •  editors  •  journals  

Year
•  2023  •  2022  •  2021  •  2020  •  2019  •  2018  •  2017  •  2016  •  2015  •  2014–1927

Sort
•  in journal  •  in proc  •  chapters  •  books  •  edited  •  spec issues  •  editorials  •  entries  •  manuals  •  tech reps  •  phd th  •  others  

Status
•  online  •  in press  •  proof  •  camera-ready  •  revised  •  accepted  •  revision  •  submitted  •  draft  •  note  

Services
•  ACM Digital Library  •  DBLP  •  IEEE Xplore  •  IRIS  •  PubMed  •  Google Scholar  •  Scopus  •  Semantic Scholar  •  Web of Science  •  DOI  

Publication

— authors

— editors

Francesca Toni, Sylwia Polberg, Richard Booth, Martin Caminada, Hiroyuki Kido

— status

published

— sort

paper in proceedings

— publication date

2022

— volume

Computational Models of Argument

— series

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

— volume

353

— pages

284–295

— number of pages

12

— location

Cardiff

— institution

Cardiff University

URLs

original page

identifiers

— DOI

10.3233/FAIA220160

— print ISBN

978-1-64368-306-5

— online ISBN

978-1-64368-307-2

Partita IVA: 01131710376 — Copyright © 2008–2023 APICe@DISI – PRIVACY