The Autonomy of Technological Systems and Responsibilities for their Use


Giovanni Sartor, Andrea Omicini

Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiß, Hin-Yan Liu, Claus Kreß (eds.)
Autonomous Weapon Systems. Law, Ethics, Policy, chapter 3, pages 39-74
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
August 2016

We shall analyse the notion of autonomy, as applied to artificial systems, and on this basis we shall consider responsibilities for the deployment of autonomous systems, in particular, in the military domain. First, we shall distinguish three dimensions of autonomy: (i) independence, (ii) cognitive skills and (iii) cognitive architecture. With respect to cognitive architecture, we shall further discern the aspects of adaptiveness, teleology and multi-level autonomy. We shall argue that these three dimensions of autonomy are orthogonal, in the sense that a system can exhibit very different levels of autonomy under each dimension. This three-pronged approach will help us to clarify some aspects of the debate concerning autonomy of artificial systems and the regulation of their use. In particular, we shall address the responsibilities and liabilities resulting from the deployment of autonomous systems in the military domain.

Publication

— authors

— editors

Nehal Bhuta, Susanne Beck, Robin Geiß, Hin-Yan Liu, Claus Kreß

— status

published

— sort

book chapter

— publication date

August 2016

— volume

Autonomous Weapon Systems. Law, Ethics, Policy

— chapter

3

— pages

39-74

— number of pages

36

— address

Cambridge, UK

URLs

original page

identifiers

— DOI

10.1017/CBO9781316597873.003

— IRIS

11585/562486

— Scopus

2-s2.0-85029495435

— print ISBN

978-1-107-15356-1

— online ISBN

978-1-316-59787-3

— ISBN–13

978-1-316-60765-7

Partita IVA: 01131710376 — Copyright © 2008–2023 APICe@DISI – PRIVACY