Roberta Calegari, Giovanni Sartor

This paper provides a formal model for the burden of persuasion in dialogues, and in particular, in legal proceedings. The model shows how an allocation of the burden of persuasion may induce single outcomes in dialectical contexts in which, without such an allocation, the status of conflicting arguments would remain undecided. Our approach is based on a two-stage labelling. The first-stage labelling determines what arguments are accepted, rejected or undecided, regardless of the allocation of burden. The second-stage labelling revises the dialectical status of first-stage undecided arguments, according to burdens of persuasion. The labelling is finally extended in such a way as to obtain a complete labelling. Our model combines two ideas that have emerged in the debate on the burden of persuasion: the idea that the burden of persuasion determines the solution of conflicts between arguments, and the idea that its satisfaction depends on the dialectical status of the arguments concerned. Our approach also addresses inversions of the burden of persuasion, namely, cases in which the burden of persuasion over an argument does not extend to its subarguments.

(keywords) Burden of Proof; Argument Evaluation; Labelling Semantics; Legal Reasoning; Legal argument
Proceedings 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (Technical Communications), ICLP 2020, EPTCS, September 2020
author = {Calegari, Roberta and Sartor, Giovanni},
title = {Burden of Persuasion in Argumentation},
booktitle = {Proceedings 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (Technical Communications), {ICLP} 2020},
year = 2020,
keywords = {Burden of Proof; Argument Evaluation; Labelling Semantics; Legal Reasoning; Legal argument},
Month = {18--24~} # sep,
        location = {Rende (CS), Italy},
        editor    = {Ricca, Francesco and Russo, Alessandra and Greco, Sergio and Leone, Nicola and Artikis, Alexander and Friedrich, Gerhard  and Fodor, Paul and Kimmig, Angelika and Lisi, Francesca and Maratea, Marco and Mileo, Alessandra and Riguzzi, Fabrizio},
        series = {Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science},
        volume = 325,
        publisher = {Open Publishing Association},
        pages = {151--163},
        doi = {10.4204/EPTCS.325.21}

Tags: CompuLaw


Burden of Persuasion in Argumentation

— status


— authors

Roberta Calegari, Giovanni Sartor

URLs & IDs






— BibTeX category


— event
ICLP 2020

Partita IVA: 01131710376 - Copyright © 2008-2021 APICe@DISI Research Group - PRIVACY