Changes for page Arg2P
From version 46.1
edited by Andrea Omicini
on 03/11/2021 16:22
on 03/11/2021 16:22
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 25.1
edited by Andrea Omicini
on 12/03/2021 22:13
on 12/03/2021 22:13
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -Arg2P Home1 +Arg2P - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,16 +1,13 @@ 1 -{{velocity}} 2 -(% style="background-color:$theme.fieldGradientColor" %)((( 3 -!!{{arg2p/}} (short for {{argtuprolog/}}) is a logic-based agreement framework enabling defeasible reasoning in intelligent systems 4 -))) 5 -{{/velocity}} 6 -== {{arg2p/}} in a nutshell == 1 +{{include document="MacroSheet"/}} 7 7 8 - The{{arg2p/}} argumentation engineisbuilt on the top of[[{{tuprolog/}}>>Tuprolog.WebHome||target=_blank]]({{2p/}}) engine. {{arg2p/}} is a lightweight implementation of the ASPIC+-like system for structured argumentation.3 +{{summary}}{{arg2p/}} is an argumentation engine built on the top of {{tuprolog/}} ({{2p/}}) engine. {{arg2p/}} is a lightweight implementation of the ASPIC+-like system for structured argumentation.{{/summary}} 9 9 10 -{{arg2p/}} enables defeasible reasoningandargumentation, and dealswithpriorities over rules. It includesa formal method for dealing with burden of proof (//burden of persuasion//).5 +== {{arg2p/}} in a nutshell == 11 11 12 - More informationson the project are available on the{{arg2p/}}[[GitLabwiki>>https://pika-lab.gitlab.io/argumentation/arg2p-kt/]].7 +In {{arg2p/}} arguments are produced from a set of defeasible rules, and attack relationships between arguments are captured by argumentation graphs. The arguments of such graphs are labelled by following a labelling semantics. This simple framework will suffice to illustrate our upcoming investigation into persuasive burdens within an argumentation setting. 13 13 14 - {{include reference="Environment"/}}9 +In addition, we use defeasible rule schemata to account for deontic reasoning, towards doctrine reification, as presented in Riveret et al., 2019. 15 15 11 +Moreover, the model has been extended following the burden of proof model presented in [[Calegari and Sartor, 2020>>Publications.BurdenofproofIclp2020]]. 16 16 13 +More information about the format of the knowledge base and rules can be found on the basic syntax.
