Changes for page Arg2P

From version 27.1
edited by Roberta Calegari
on 13/03/2021 07:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 24.1
edited by Andrea Omicini
on 12/03/2021 22:13
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.RobertaCalegari
1 +XWiki.AndreaOmicini
Content
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
1 1  {{include document="MacroSheet"/}}
2 2  
3 -{{summary}}{{arg2p/}} is logic-based agreement framework enabling defeasible reasoning and agents’ conversation in AI applications so particularly suitable for reaching agents’ explainable intelligent behaviours.{{/summary}}
3 +{{summary}}{{arg2p/}} is an argumentation engine built on the top of {{tuprolog/}} ({{2p/}}) engine. {{arg2p/}} is a lightweight implementation of the ASPIC+-like system for structured argumentation.{{/summary}}
4 4  
5 5  == {{arg2p/}} in a nutshell ==
6 6  
7 -The {{arg2p/}} argumentation engine is built on the top of {{tuprolog/}} ({{2p/}}) engine. {{arg2p/}} is a lightweight implementation of the ASPIC+-like system for structured argumentation.
7 +In {{arg2p/}} arguments are produced from a set of defeasible rules, and attack relationships between arguments are captured by argumentation graphs. The arguments of such graphs are labelled by following a labelling semantics. This simple framework will suffice to illustrate our upcoming investigation into persuasive burdens within an argumentation setting.
8 8  
9 -In {{arg2p/}} arguments are produced from a set of defeasible rules possibly containing deontic statements, and attack relationships between arguments are captured by argumentation graphs. The arguments of such graphs are labelled by following standard Dung's labelling semantics.
9 +In addition, we use defeasible rule schemata to account for deontic reasoning, towards doctrine reification, as presented in Riveret et al., 2019.
10 10  
11 -The model has been extended following the burden of proof model and semantics presented in [[Calegari and Sartor, 2020>>Publications.BurdenofproofIclp2020]].
11 +Moreover, the model has been extended following the burden of proof model presented in [[Calegari and Sartor, 2020>>Publications/BurdenofproofIclp2020]].
12 12  
13 13  More information about the format of the knowledge base and rules can be found on the basic syntax.

Contacts

Roberta Calegari email  |  Giovanni Ciatto email  |  Andrea Omicini email  |  Giuseppe Pisano email  |  Giovanni Sartor email

Downloads

GitHub  |  Maven Central  |  NPM

Documentation

GitLab

Online tools

Playground

Sources

GitHub