Changes for page Arg2P
From version 25.1
edited by Andrea Omicini
on 12/03/2021 22:13
on 12/03/2021 22:13
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
To version 60.1
edited by Andrea Omicini
on 12/11/2021 22:59
on 12/11/2021 22:59
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Arg2P - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@ 1 -{{include document="MacroSheet"/}} 1 += {{stringIta}}Home {{/stringIta}}{{arg2p/}}{{stringEng}} Home{{/stringEng}} = 2 +{{velocity}} 3 +(% style="border-color:$theme.borderColor; border-style:hidden solid solid hidden" %)!!{{arg2p/}} (short for {{argtuprolog/}}) is a logic-based agreement framework enabling defeasible reasoning in intelligent systems 4 +{{/velocity}} 5 +>{{arg2p/}} in a nutshell 2 2 3 -{{ summary}}{{arg2p/}}isan argumentation engine built on the top of {{tuprolog/}} ({{2p/}}) engine. {{arg2p/}} is a lightweight implementation of the ASPIC+-like system for structured argumentation.{{/summary}}7 +The {{arg2p/}} argumentation engine is built on the top of [[{{tuprolog/}}>>Tuprolog.WebHome||target=_blank]] ({{2p/}}) engine. {{arg2p/}} is a lightweight implementation of the ASPIC+-like system for structured argumentation. 4 4 5 - =={{arg2p/}}in a nutshell==9 +{{arg2p/}} enables defeasible reasoning and argumentation, and deals with priorities over rules. It includes a formal method for dealing with burden of proof (//burden of persuasion//). 6 6 7 -In {{arg2p/}} arguments are produced from a set of defeasible rules, and attack relationships between arguments are captured by argumentation graphs. The arguments of such graphs are labelled by following a labelling semantics. This simple framework will suffice to illustrate our upcoming investigation into persuasive burdens within an argumentation setting. 11 +More informations on the project are available on the {{arg2p/}} [[GitLab wiki>>https://pika-lab.gitlab.io/argumentation/arg2p-kt/]]. 12 +{{include reference="Environment"/}} 8 8 9 -In addition, we use defeasible rule schemata to account for deontic reasoning, towards doctrine reification, as presented in Riveret et al., 2019. 10 10 11 -Moreover, the model has been extended following the burden of proof model presented in [[Calegari and Sartor, 2020>>Publications.BurdenofproofIclp2020]]. 12 - 13 -More information about the format of the knowledge base and rules can be found on the basic syntax.